Hays v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a second extension of time to 1/23/2015 for receipt of plaintiff's opening brief. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/13/2015. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
JONATHAN O. PENA, SBN#278044
Law Office of Jonathan Pena
333 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 102
Fresno, CA 93722
Ph: 559-412-5390, Fax: 866-282-6709
info@jonathanpena.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
FRESNO DIVISION
9
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ANDREW MICHAEL HAYS,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Case No.: 1:14-CV-00001-SMS
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO
SERVE PLAINTIFF’S OPENING BRIEF
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective
counsel of record, that the time for serving Plaintiff’s OPENING BRIEF be extended from
January 13, 2015, to January 23, 2015. This is Plaintiff’s second request for an extension with
regard to the plaintiff’s opening brief.
Due to family issues beyond the control of Plaintiff’s Counsel, additional time is needed
to complete Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. Counsel apologizes to the Court and all parties involved
for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 13, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
/s/__Jonathan Omar Pena__
JONATHAN OMAR PENA
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
1
Dated: January 13, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
2
3
4
5
By:
6
7
(As authorized via email on 1/13/15)
/s/_____________________
Patrick William Snyder
Office of the General Counsel/SSA
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
ORDER
10
11
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
12
13
14
Dated: 1/13/2015
/s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?