Hays v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a second extension of time to 1/23/2015 for receipt of plaintiff's opening brief. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/13/2015. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JONATHAN O. PENA, SBN#278044 Law Office of Jonathan Pena 333 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 102 Fresno, CA 93722 Ph: 559-412-5390, Fax: 866-282-6709 info@jonathanpena.com Attorney for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANDREW MICHAEL HAYS, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No.: 1:14-CV-00001-SMS STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PLAINTIFF’S OPENING BRIEF 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for serving Plaintiff’s OPENING BRIEF be extended from January 13, 2015, to January 23, 2015. This is Plaintiff’s second request for an extension with regard to the plaintiff’s opening brief. Due to family issues beyond the control of Plaintiff’s Counsel, additional time is needed to complete Plaintiff’s Opening Brief. Counsel apologizes to the Court and all parties involved for any inconvenience caused by this delay. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 13, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /s/__Jonathan Omar Pena__ JONATHAN OMAR PENA Attorney for Plaintiff 1 1 Dated: January 13, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 2 3 4 5 By: 6 7 (As authorized via email on 1/13/15) /s/_____________________ Patrick William Snyder Office of the General Counsel/SSA Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 ORDER 10 11 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 Dated: 1/13/2015 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?