Meador v. Aye et al

Filing 129

ORDER DENYING 128 Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Contact FBI signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/24/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 GORDON DALE MEADOR, Case No. 1:14-cv-00006-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT TO CONTACT FBI 11 v. 12 13 K. AYE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Gordon Meador ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim 18 for violation of his Eighth Amendment right to medical care against Defendants Garza, Sellers,1 Aye, 19 Moon, Nguyen, Clark, Kim, and Gill. 20 On April 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a motion for the Court to 21 contact the FBI. (ECF No. 128). Plaintiff alleges that there is a conspiracy to kill him, and 22 requests that the Court contact the FBI on his behalf. The motion does not appear to concern the 23 claims pending in this case, but rather Plaintiff’s concern that there is a conspiracy to kill him that 24 has resulted in various unsuccessful attacks over time. Plaintiff attaches a court order from 25 another pending case denying a motion for temporary restraining order based on the same 26 allegations. (ECF No. 128, at pgs. 7-8). That Court explained what Plaintiff must do to have 27 1 28 Defendants refer to “Sellers” as “Selliers.” 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 such a claim heard in federal court, including filing a complaint. Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. Generally, the Court does not contact the FBI on behalf of parties. Plaintiff’s allegations, while serious, do not relate to the complaint in this case. This Court, like the Court that has already heard this matter, does not have the jurisdiction to independently investigate safety concerns filed through motions such as this. If Plaintiff wishes a court to act on the allegations he mentions, he needs to file a complaint in an appropriate court to start a case related to this issue. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to contact the FBI is DENIED. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: April 24, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?