Meador v. Aye et al

Filing 38

ORDER FINDING Certain Claims Cognizable and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/22/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 GORDON D. MEADOR, 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:14-cv-0006 DLB PC ORDER FINDING CERTAIN CLAIMS COGNIZABLE AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS DR. K. AYE, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Gordon D. Meador (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Plaintiff filed this action on January 2, 2014. On January 16, 2015, the Court screened the 21 Complaint and determined that it failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted 22 leave to file an amended complaint. On February 11, 2015, counsel was appointed for Plaintiff for 23 the limited purpose of drafting and filing a First Amended Complaint. On September 22, 2015, 24 Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff named as Defendants: Kihn Aye, M.D.; Jong 25 Moon, M.D.; Huu Nguyen, M.D.; Edgar Clark, M.D.; Julian Kim, M.D.; Richard Smith, M.D.; 26 Jeffrey Wang, M.D.; Ravijot Gill, D.O.; Garza, L.V.N.; Sellars, L.V.N., and Does 1-50. Counsel’s 27 representation was thereafter discontinued and Plaintiff is now proceeding pro se. 28 On December 9, 2015, the Court screened the First Amended Complaint. The Court 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 determined that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of a violation of his Eighth Amendment right to medical care by Defendants Garza, Sellars, Aye, Moon, Nguyen, Clark, Kim, Smith, and Gill. Plaintiff was directed to notify the Court whether he wished to proceed only on the claim deemed cognizable by the Court, or if he wished to file a Second Amended Complaint. On December 17, 2015, Plaintiff responded to the Court’s order. Plaintiff elects to waive the opportunity to file an amended complaint and agrees to proceed on the claims deemed cognizable by the Court. Accordingly, the Court issues this Order to dismiss the remaining claims and Defendants. 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action shall proceed on the following claim: Violation of his Eighth Amendment right to medical care by Defendants Garza, Sellars, Aye, Moon, Nguyen, Clark, Kim, Smith, and Gill; and 2. All other claims, as well as Defendant Wang, are DISMISSED from this action. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis December 22, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?