Meador v. Aye et al
Filing
38
ORDER FINDING Certain Claims Cognizable and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/22/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
GORDON D. MEADOR,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:14-cv-0006 DLB PC
ORDER FINDING CERTAIN CLAIMS
COGNIZABLE AND DISMISSING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
DR. K. AYE, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff Gordon D. Meador (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
Plaintiff filed this action on January 2, 2014. On January 16, 2015, the Court screened the
21
Complaint and determined that it failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted
22
leave to file an amended complaint. On February 11, 2015, counsel was appointed for Plaintiff for
23
the limited purpose of drafting and filing a First Amended Complaint. On September 22, 2015,
24
Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff named as Defendants: Kihn Aye, M.D.; Jong
25
Moon, M.D.; Huu Nguyen, M.D.; Edgar Clark, M.D.; Julian Kim, M.D.; Richard Smith, M.D.;
26
Jeffrey Wang, M.D.; Ravijot Gill, D.O.; Garza, L.V.N.; Sellars, L.V.N., and Does 1-50. Counsel’s
27
representation was thereafter discontinued and Plaintiff is now proceeding pro se.
28
On December 9, 2015, the Court screened the First Amended Complaint. The Court
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
determined that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of a violation of his Eighth Amendment right to
medical care by Defendants Garza, Sellars, Aye, Moon, Nguyen, Clark, Kim, Smith, and Gill.
Plaintiff was directed to notify the Court whether he wished to proceed only on the claim deemed
cognizable by the Court, or if he wished to file a Second Amended Complaint. On December 17,
2015, Plaintiff responded to the Court’s order. Plaintiff elects to waive the opportunity to file an
amended complaint and agrees to proceed on the claims deemed cognizable by the Court.
Accordingly, the Court issues this Order to dismiss the remaining claims and Defendants.
8
9
10
11
12
ORDER
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action shall proceed on the following claim: Violation of his Eighth Amendment right
to medical care by Defendants Garza, Sellars, Aye, Moon, Nguyen, Clark, Kim, Smith, and Gill; and
2. All other claims, as well as Defendant Wang, are DISMISSED from this action.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
December 22, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?