Meador v. Aye et al

Filing 45

ORDER DENYING 44 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/24/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GORDON DALE MEADOR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 K. AYE, et al. , 15 1:14-cv-0006 DLB (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Document# 44) Defendant. 16 17 On February 16, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. 18 Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 19 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require an attorney to represent 20 plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the 21 Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 1816 (1989). However, in certain 22 exceptional circumstances the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 23 section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. 24 Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek 25 volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In this case, the Court 26 appointed counsel for the limited purpose of drafting an amended complaint. Counsel was 27 discharged after the amended complaint was filed at Counsel’s request. The Court will seek 28 volunteer counsel in the future should the need arise, but at this time the Court does not find the 1 1 2 3 required exceptional circumstances for appointment of counsel. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff=s motion for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY DENIED, without prejudice. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis February 24, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 L. Beck 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?