Hawkins v. Ibarra et al

Filing 49

ORDER ASSIGNING ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE IN LIGHT OF THE PARTIES' CONSENT signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/2/2016. The new case number is 1:14-cv-00009-BAM-(PC). (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 HOMER EARL HAWKINS, 11 Plaintiff 12 v. 13 CASE NO. 1:14-CV-009 AWI BAM ORDER ASSIGNING ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE IN LIGHT OF THE PARTIES’ CONSENT S. IBARRA and D.P. SWEENEY, 14 Defendants 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 Section 1983. On October 31, 2016, Plaintiff consented to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. See 19 Doc. No. 48. On January 8, 2014, Defendants consented to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.1 See 20 Doc. No. 4. All parties to this action having voluntarily consented to have a Magistrate Judge 21 conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial and entry of a final 22 judgment, it is appropriate to reassign this matter. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This action is assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe for 25 all purposes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conduct any and all 26 further proceedings in the case, including the trial and entry of final judgment; 27 28 1 Defendant Sweeney was terminated from this case on November 17, 2014. See Doc. No. 18. Defendant Ibarra is the only remaining Defendant in this matter. See id. 1 2. 2 The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action in its entirety to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe; 3 3. Any future hearing dates set before the undersigned are VACATED; and 4 4. The new case number shall be: 1:14-CV-009 BAM. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2016 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?