Hawkins v. Ibarra et al
Filing
61
ORDER CONTINUING Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing as Moot and Vacating Order Directing Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/24/17. Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 4/12/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
HOMER EARL HAWKINS,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
S. IBARRA,
Defendant.
14
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14-cv-00009-BAM (PC)
ORDER CONTINUING TELEPHONIC
TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO CONTINUE TELEPHONIC TRIAL
CONFIRMATION HEARING AS MOOT
AND VACATING ORDER DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
(ECF Nos. 56, 57)
17
18
Plaintiff Homer Earl Hawkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this
19
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A telephonic trial confirmation hearing is
20
scheduled for March 22, 2017, and a trial is scheduled for June 6, 2017.
21
On February 17, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court extend the
22
telephonic trial confirmation hearing.
23
necessary, on February 21, 2017, the Court directed Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s motion
24
no later than March 1, 2017. (ECF No. 57.) To date, no response has been filed.
(ECF No. 56.)
Finding a response to the motion
25
On February 24, 2017, the Court set this matter for a settlement conference before
26
Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on March 24, 2017. In light of the settlement conference, the
27
telephonic trial confirmation hearing currently set for March 22, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. is HEREBY
28
1
1
CONTINUED to April 12, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate
2
Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.
3
Based on the continued telephonic trial confirmation hearing, Plaintiff’s motion to extend
4
the date for the telephonic trial confirmation hearing is now moot and a response to that motion
5
is no longer necessary.
6
confirmation hearing is HEREBY DENIED as moot, and the Court’s order directing Defendant
7
to file a response to Plaintiff’s motion by March 1, 2017, is HEREBY VACATED.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to extend the telephonic trial
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 24, 2017
11
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?