Couch v. Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc., et al.

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 21 Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/13/2014. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID COUCH,

12
13
14

CASE NO. 1:14-CV-0010-LJO-JLT
Plaintiff,

v.
MORGAN STANLEY & CO.,
INCORPORATED, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 21)

15
Defendants.
16
17

Before the Court is the stipulation of the parties seeking to allow Defendants until May

18

30, 2014 to file their answer to the first amended complaint. (Doc. 21) The parties agree that

19

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint alleges that Defendants engaged in “intentional and negligent

20

interference with existing and prospective economic relations” and Defendants need additional

21

time to investigate this claim before answering. Id.

22
23
24

Thus, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: Defendants’ answer to Plaintiff’s first
amended complaint SHALL be filed no later than May 30, 2014.
No further extensions of time are contemplated by the Court.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 13, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE