Couch v. Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc., et al.

Filing 55

ORDER VACATING Deadlines 52 and GRANTING IN PART Defendants Ex Parte Applicatin an ORDER Shortening Time on Defendants Petition for an ORDER Permanently STAYING Aribitration Proceedings and/or for an ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 50 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/22/2015. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 DAVID COUCH, 6 1:14-cv-10-LJO-JLT Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING DEADLINES (Doc. 52) AND GRANTING IN PART 7 v. DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER 8 MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INC., AND SHORTENING TIME ON MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC, DEFENDANTS’ PETITION FOR AN 9 ORDER PERMANENTLY STAYING Defendants. ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS 10 AND/OR FOR AN ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 50) 11 12 13 On June 18, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ ex parte application for an order shortening the time on Defendants’ petition for an order permanently staying arbitration and/or for an order granting a 14 preliminary injunction. Doc. 52. The Court now VACATES the deadlines as set forth in that order. The 15 Court ORDERS that Defendants’ petition (Doc. 51) will be briefed and considered as follows: 16   18 July 15, 2015: Due date for Defendants’ reply in support of its petition.  17 July 8, 2015: Due date for Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ petition. July 22, 2015: Hearing on Defendants’ petition.1 19 The Court further finds that since there is currently no arbitration date, no prejudice to any party 20 results in this short continuance. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: 23 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 22, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 1 If appropriate, the Court will vacate the hearing date and Defendants’ petition will be submitted on the papers. See Local Rule 230(g). 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?