Couch v. Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc., et al.

Filing 70

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO PERMANENTLY STAY ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS OR GRANT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 8, 2015. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 DAVID COUCH, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INCORPORATED and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC Defendants. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-CV-0010-LJO-JLT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO PERMANENTLY STAY ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS OR GRANT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Courtroom: 4 Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE LEGAL_US_E # 115727551.1 1 Good cause appearing therefore, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, per Plaintiff’s representations and request, the briefing 3 schedule on Defendants’ petition to permanently stay arbitration proceedings or grant preliminary 4 injunction be extended one-week as follows: 5  July 15, 2015: Due date for Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ petition. 6  July 22, 2015: Due date for Defendants’ reply in support of its petition. 7  July 29, 2015: Hearing on Defendants’ petition. 8 9 The Court further finds that since there is currently no arbitration date, no prejudice to any party results in this short continuance. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill July 8, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE LEGAL_US_E # 115727551.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?