Couch v. Morgan Stanley & Co, Inc., et al.
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO PERMANENTLY STAY ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS OR GRANT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 8, 2015. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
DAVID COUCH,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
MORGAN STANLEY & CO.,
INCORPORATED and MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-CV-0010-LJO-JLT
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
PERMANENTLY STAY ARBITRATION
PROCEEDINGS OR GRANT PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Courtroom: 4
Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
LEGAL_US_E # 115727551.1
1
Good cause appearing therefore,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, per Plaintiff’s representations and request, the briefing
3
schedule on Defendants’ petition to permanently stay arbitration proceedings or grant preliminary
4
injunction be extended one-week as follows:
5
July 15, 2015: Due date for Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ petition.
6
July 22, 2015: Due date for Defendants’ reply in support of its petition.
7
July 29, 2015: Hearing on Defendants’ petition.
8
9
The Court further finds that since there is currently no arbitration date, no prejudice to any
party results in this short continuance.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
July 8, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME ON THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
LEGAL_US_E # 115727551.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?