White v. Citigroup, Inc.

Filing 8

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed 7 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/26/14: Show Cause Response due by April 4, 2014. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ROBERT WHITE,

9
10

CASE NO. CV F 14-0037 LJO BAM
Plaintiffs,

vs.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
(Doc. 7.)

11
12

CITIGROUP, INC.
Defendant.

13
14

________________________________/

15
16

This Court’s February 18, 2014 order required the parties, no later than March 24,

17

2014, to file papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause

18

why the action has not been dismissed. The parties have failed to comply with the February

19

18, 2014 order and to file required papers.

20

This Court’s Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with an order of this

21

Court “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by

22

statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

23

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS plaintiff, no later than April 4, 2014, to file papers to

24

show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on him for failure to file required papers

25

and/or for disobedience of the February 18, 2014 order. This order to show cause will be

26

deemed discharged, if no later than April 4, 2014, papers are filed to dismiss or conclude this

27

action in its entirety.

28

This Court ORDERS plaintiff's counsel to serve a copy of this order on defendant
1

1

and/or its counsel.

2

This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they must observe and comply

3

with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are

4

subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

March 26, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2