Gonzalez v. Harris Ranch Beef Company et al

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS 42 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on October 6, 2014. (Munoz, I)

1
2
3
4
5
6

COOLEY LLP
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463)
([e-mail])
DAVID S. HOUSKA (295918)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant
PAR SPRINGER-MILLER SYSTEMS, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

FRESNO DIVISION

11
12
13

JOSE GONZALEZ, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18

21

HARRIS RANCH BEEF COMPANY, a
California corporation; HARRIS RANCH
BEEF HOLDING COMPANY, a
California corporation; HARRIS FARMS,
INC., a California corporation; and DOES
2 through 10, inclusive,

24

Complaint Filed:
Cross-Complaint Filed:

December 4, 2013
June 2, 2014

Defendants.
HARRIS FARMS, INC., a California
corporation,
Third-Party
Complainant,

22
23

ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
PAR SPRINGER-MILLER’S REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS

v.

19
20

Case No. 1:14-cv-00038-LIO-SAB

v.

25

SPRINGER-MILLER SYSTEMS, INC., a
Vermont corporation and DOES 1-20,
inclusive,

26

Third-Party Defendants.

27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO

110805444 v1

ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY DEF’S REQ.
FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS
1:14-CV-00038-LIO-SAB

1

This Matter, having come before the Court on the Objection of Harris Ranch, filed

2

October 2, 2014, and Third-Party Defendant PAR Springer-Miller Systems, Inc.’s Request For

3

Extension of Page Limits, filed October 3, 2014, and the Court having considered all papers and

4

pleadings submitted by the parties:

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

Third-Party Defendant PAR Springer-Miller Systems, Inc.’s Request For Extension of

7

Page Limits is GRANTED. The page limit for PAR Springer-Miller’s Reply brief in the action

8

above will be extended to 11 pages. The Court will consider the brief as it was originally filled.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

October 6, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO

110805444 v1

1.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THIRD-PARTY
DEF’S REQ. FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS
1:14-CV-00038-LIO-SAB