Taylor v. Valenzuela
Filing
6
ORDER Denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 01/24/2014. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CARL A. TAYLOR,
12
Case No. 1:14-cv-00050-SAB-HC
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
VALENZUELA,
[ECF NO. 3]
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute
18 right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d
19 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title
20 18 U.S.C. ยง 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the
21 interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the
22 present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of
23 counsel at the present time.
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of
2 counsel is DENIED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 24, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?