Smith et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
151
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING as to 138 140 DEFENDANTS' MOTION to DISMISS: The Motion Hearing is reset from 3/27/2015 to 4/15/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/10/2015. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COREY LAMAR SMITH, et al.,
12
13
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 1:14-cv-00060-LJO-SAB
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING
v.
(ECF Nos. 146, 147, 149, 150)
14
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on February 6, 2015, with a hearing on the motion
18
set for March 27, 2015.
On March 5, 2015, Defendants Beard, Brazelton, Cate, Hartley,
19
Hubbard, Hysen, Kernan, Meyer, Rothchild, Schwartz, Schwarzenegger and Yates filed an
20
application to shorten time to hear a motion and a motion to continue the March 27, 2015 hearing.
21
The Court granted the application to shorten time; and Plaintiffs were ordered to file an
22
opposition to the motion. On March 6, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an opposition. On March 9, 2015,
23
Defendants Igbinosa and Winslow filed a notice of joinder in the motion to continue the hearing
24
and the parties filed a stipulation to continue the hearing.
25
The Court shall approve the stipulation to continue the hearing to April 15, 2015.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 138, 140) is continued
from March 27, 2015 to April 15, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9;
1
1
2.
2
Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be fil on or be
o
t
n
s
led
efore April 1,
2015; and
3
3.
Defendants reply shall be filed on or before A
s’
l
April 8, 2015.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORD
T
DERED.
ated:
Da
Ma
arch 10, 20
015
U
UNITED ST
TATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
E
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?