Jackson v. Kaplan Higher Education, LLC, et al.

Filing 19

ORDER Regarding November 24, 2014 Discovery Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/25/2014. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELLA JACKSON, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 1:14-CV-00073-AWI-BAM Plaintiff, v. KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, an unknown business entity, KAPLAN, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, ORDER REGARDING NOVEMBER 24, 2014 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE Defendants. 17 18 19 ______________________________________/ 20 On November 24, 2014, the Court conducted an informal discovery dispute conference. 21 Amanda Whitten appeared telephonically on behalf of Plaintiff, Marcella Jackson (“Plaintiff”). 22 Philippe Lebel, appeared telephonically on behalf of Defendant, Kaplan Higher Education, LLC 23 (“Kaplan”). 24 25 During the conference, the parties stipulated to an informal resolution of the following 26 discovery disputes: (1) The non-appearance of an out-of-state third-party witness from Matrix 27 Absence Management (“Matrix”) at a subpoenaed deposition; and (2) Kaplan’s recently issued 28 subpoenas seeking to compel Plaintiff’s medical records for the past five years. ORDER REGARDING NOVEMBER 24, 2014 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE CASE NO. 1:14-CV-00073-AWI-BAM 1 2 3 Having carefully considered the arguments of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Court is unable to rule on Plaintiff’s request to compel the deposition of a 4 corporate witness from Matrix pursuant to Rules 30(b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil 5 because it lacks jurisdiction to do so. To enforce the subpoena, Plaintiff must comply with Fed. R. 6 Civ. P. 45 in the appropriate district. 7 (2) Given Plaintiff’s allegations of severe and ongoing mental and emotional distress, 8 Plaintiff has waived any privacy interest in her medical records. Accordingly, Kaplan is entitled 9 to discovery of Plaintiff’s mental and physical health records for the time period beginning 10 November 1, 2011 through the present, from the health care providers served with the subpoenas. 11 These health care providers include: Kaiser Permanente; Community Behavioral Health Center; 12 the Fresno County Department of Behavioral Health; and Roberta Samples, MSN, APRN, FNP- 13 BC, Anderson Medical Associates. All records must be produced at the place(s) identified in the 14 subpoenas on or before December 12, 2014. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Plaintiff shall 15 sign the appropriate medical releases, sufficiently in advance of the production date, to effectuate 16 the production of her records pursuant to the subpoenas and this Order; and 17 (3) The Court extends the non-expert discovery deadline for the parties to file any 18 motion or application regarding these issues no later than December 19, 2014. The Court 19 encourages the parties to resolve any issues related to these disputes informally. If a motion is 20 filed, it must be brought on shortened time. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: /s/ Barbara November 25, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING NOVEMBER 24, 2014 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?