Jackson v. Kaplan Higher Education, LLC, et al.

Filing 21

Joint STIPULATION to Extend Deadlines re: Medical Records; and ORDER thereon - 1.) The deadline to file any motions related to the medical records outlined is extended to January 1, 2015. 2.) Defendants may designate a medical expert related to Plaintiffs medical records within 21 days of receipt of the final medical records. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/23/2014. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 CHERYL D. ORR (SBN 143196) PHILIPPE A. LEBEL (SBN 274032) SABA S. SHATARA (SBN 294150) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants Kaplan, Inc. and Kaplan Higher Education, LLC 10 SHELLEY G. BRYANT - #222925 AMANDA B. WHITTEN - #251160 BRYANT WHITTEN, LLP 8050 North Palm Avenue, Suite 210 Fresno, California 93711 (559) 494-4910 Telephone (559) 421-0369 Facsimile 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff, MARCELLA JACKSON 8 9 12 13 UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 MARCELLA JACKSON, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 22 v. Case No. 1:14-CV-00073-AWI-BAM JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES RE: MEDICAL RECORDS; AND ORDER THEREON KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, an unknown business entity, KAPLAN, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO ACTIVE/ 78273461.1 JOINT STIPULATION ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES RE: MEDICAL RECORDS 1 Pursuant Rules 16 and 29 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants KAPLAN, 2 INC. and KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff 3 Marcella Jackson (“Plaintiff”), through their respective counsel, hereby jointly submit this 4 stipulation for an order to (1) extend the deadline to file any motion or application related to 5 Plaintiff’s medical records, from December 19, 2014, to January 1, 2015; and (2) permit 6 Defendants to designate an expert related to Plaintiff’s medical records up to 21 days after 7 Defendants receive Plaintiff’s final medical records from all providers subpoenaed. 8 9 WHEREAS, on November 25, 2014, the Court issued an Order Regarding November 24, 2014 Discovery Conference providing that Defendants were entitled to discovery regarding 10 Plaintiff’s mental and physical health records for the time period beginning November 1, 2011, 11 through the present, from health care providers served with subpoenas; 12 WHEREAS, Defendants served the following health care providers with subpoenas: 13 Kaiser Permanente; Community Behavioral Health Center; the Fresno County Department of 14 Behavioral Health; and Roberta Samples, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC, Anderson Medical Associates; 15 WHEREAS, the Court’s order required the subpoenaed medical providers to produce 16 Plaintiff’s medical records on or before December 12, 2014, and extended the non-expert 17 discovery deadline for the parties to file any motion or application regarding this discovery issue 18 to no later than December 19, 2014; 19 WHEREAS, only one of Plaintiff’s health care providers produced responsive records by 20 the December 12, 2014 deadline; and, as of December 17, 2014, Community Behavioral Health 21 Center still has yet to provide any records, despite the Court’s order; 22 WHEREAS, while the remaining provider has represented that they will produce 23 Plaintiff’s medical records by Friday, December 19, 2014, that is insufficient time for Defendants 24 to review the records and determine whether any motion needs to be filed to address any 25 deficiencies (if any) or compel further related discovery; 26 WHEREAS, to allow adequate time to review the late produced records, the parties agree 27 and request that the Court extend the deadline to file any motions or applications related to the 28 medical records to January 1, 2015; D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO -1ACTIVE/ 78273461.1 JOINT STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES RE: MEDICAL RECORDS 1 WHEREAS, since Defendants cannot reasonably determine whether they will need to 2 designate a medical expert until they have received and reviewed Plaintiff’s medical records, the 3 parties agree that Defendants may designate a medical expert related to Plaintiff’s medical 4 records within 21 days of receipt of the final medical records; 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, Defendants agree to promptly make any designated expert available for deposition; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties through their undersigned counsel of record that: 1. The deadline to file any motions related to the medical records outlined is extended to January 1, 2015. 2. Defendants may designate a medical expert related to Plaintiff’s medical records within 21 days of receipt of the final medical records. 13 14 Dated: December 19, 2014 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 15 By: /s/ Philippe A. Lebel Cheryl D. Orr Philippe A. Lebel Saba S. Shatara 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants Kaplan, Inc. and Kaplan Higher Education, LLC 19 20 21 Dated: December 23, 2014 BRYANT WHITTEN LLP 22 By: /s/ Amanda Witten Amanda Whitten 23 24 Attorney for Plaintiff, MARCELLA JACKSON 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO -2ACTIVE/ 78273461.1 JOINT STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES RE: MEDICAL RECORDS 1 ORDER 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby approves this Joint Stipulation to 3 Extend Deadlines Re: Medical Records as set forth above. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara December 23, 2014 A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO _ -3ACTIVE/ 78273461.1 JOINT STIPULATION & ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES RE: MEDICAL RECORDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?