Vang v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION to Modify Briefing Schedule; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/3/2015. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
4 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail _steven_rohlfing.office@speakeasy.net 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff GE H. VANG 1 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GE H. VANG 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting 14 Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant 16 ) Case No.: 1:14-CV-00082-GSA ) ) STIPULATION TO MODIFY ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TO THE HONORABLE GARY S. AUSTIN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: Plaintiff Ge H. Vang (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to modify the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand to February 2, 2015; and that Defendant shall have until March 4, 2015, to file his opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will continue to be due March 10, 2015. 26 -1- 1 A modification of the prior agreed upon schedule is needed because 2 Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Spouse is receiving treatment for her Stage IV breast cancer 3 which metastasized initially to her liver and progressed to her lungs, throat, and 4 spine. Despite chemotherapy treatment, Counsel was recently informed that his 5 spouse’s cancer has continued to progress with spinal tumor expanding into the 6 spinal canal and unequivocal progress of multiple tumors resulting in a massively 7 enlarged liver. In addition, on January 10, 2015, complications arising from this 8 disease process resulted in Counsel’s spouse’s hospitalization. Despite attempts to 9 slow the progression of the Cancer with at least 8 separate lines of chemotherapy 10 treatment Counsel’s spouses’ cancer has unequivocally progressed to the point 11 where her physicians have stated on January 13, 2015 that they “would be very 12 surprised to still be treating her one year from now” without some significant 13 response to treatment that has yet to occur. 14 Counsel required the additional time to file the motion for summary judgment 15 to allow him to devote the appropriate time to assist his Spouse and his two 16 elementary school aged children through this obviously stressful experience. 17 Counsel notes that the modified briefing schedule continues to require any 18 reply brief to be filed by the same March 10, 2015 date as previously set by this 19 Court. Consequently, the modification results in a reduction of time for Counsel to 20 prepare any reply and does not extend the time for this matter to be submitted to the 21 Court for decision. Counsel sincerely apologizes to the court for any 22 inconvenience this may have had upon it or its staff. 23 24 25 26 -2- 1 DATE: January 29, 2015 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 2 /s/ Steven G. Rosales BY: _________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff GE H. VANG 3 4 5 6 DATED: January 29, 2015 BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney 7 8 */S/- Jeffrey T. Chen 9 10 11 12 _________________________________ Jeffrey T. Chen Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant [*Via email authorization] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3- 1 2 ORDER Based on the stipulation between the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 3 that Plaintiff may have a retroactive extension of time, up to and including 4 February 2, 2015, in which to file his Opening Brief; Defendant may have an 5 extension of time to file any opposition until March 4, 2015. The Opening Brief, 6 which was filed on February 2, 2015, is deemed timely filed. Any reply by Plaintiff 7 will continue to be due on or before March 10, 2015. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?