Oliver v. Adams et al

Filing 71

ORDER Directing Counsel Michael S. Romano to Submit a Substitution of Attorney as Required by Local Rule 182(g) within Twenty-One Days from the Date of Service of this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 01/12/2018. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH OLIVER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 DARRYL ADAMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL MICHAEL S. ROMANO TO SUBMIT A SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL RULE 182(g) WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 11, 2018, counsel Michael S. Romano filed a notice of appearance on behalf of 19 20 Case No.: 1:14-cv-00088-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Kenneth Oliver is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Kenneth Oliver, signed only by counsel. (ECF No. 70.) Counsel is advised that when an attorney seeks to represent a pro per party in a pending action, 21 22 Local Rule 182(g) requires the attorney to file a “Substitution of Attorneys” document, signed by the 23 attorney and the party. That substitution must be approved by the court so the words “IT IS SO 24 ORDERED,” with spaces designated for the date and signature of the Judge, shall be affixed at the end 25 of each Substitution of Attorneys. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, Mr. Romano shall file a 2 “Substitution of Attorneys” in accordance with Local Rule 182(g). If a Substitution of Attorneys is 3 not filed, the Court will assume Plaintiff continues in this action pro per and counsel Romano will be 4 removed as counsel of record in this case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 January 12, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?