Bullock v. Wasco State Prison Medical

Filing 43

ORDER denying 41 Motion to compel access to law library and for legal copying signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/2/17. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GORDON BULLOCK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 BROCK SNEELA, et al. 15 Case No. 1:14-cv-00092-EPG-PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL ACCESS TO LAW LIBRARY AND FOR LEGAL COPYING Defendants. (ECF No. 41) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Gordon Bullock is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action 19 alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to 20 compel access to the law library at his institution and requiring them to provide him with 21 copying services. (ECF No. 41.) Plaintiff contends that he requires access to the law library 22 because he has an initial scheduling conference on April 10, 2017. On the same date, Plaintiff 23 also filed his initial scheduling conference statement. (ECF No. 42.) 24 Plaintiff has already filed his initial scheduling conference statement in advance of the 25 April 10, 2017 scheduling conference. Plaintiff is not required to provide any additional copies 26 to the Court in preparation for this hearing. The Court does not expect and will not require any 27 legal argument by Plaintiff at the initial scheduling conference. 28 \\\ 1 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED without prejudice. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 2, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?