Bullock v. Wasco State Prison Medical
Filing
43
ORDER denying 41 Motion to compel access to law library and for legal copying signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/2/17. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GORDON BULLOCK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
BROCK SNEELA, et al.
15
Case No. 1:14-cv-00092-EPG-PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL ACCESS TO LAW
LIBRARY AND FOR LEGAL COPYING
Defendants.
(ECF No. 41)
16
17
18
Plaintiff Gordon Bullock is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action
19
alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to
20
compel access to the law library at his institution and requiring them to provide him with
21
copying services. (ECF No. 41.) Plaintiff contends that he requires access to the law library
22
because he has an initial scheduling conference on April 10, 2017. On the same date, Plaintiff
23
also filed his initial scheduling conference statement. (ECF No. 42.)
24
Plaintiff has already filed his initial scheduling conference statement in advance of the
25
April 10, 2017 scheduling conference. Plaintiff is not required to provide any additional copies
26
to the Court in preparation for this hearing. The Court does not expect and will not require any
27
legal argument by Plaintiff at the initial scheduling conference.
28
\\\
1
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED without prejudice.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 2, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?