Bullock v. Wasco State Prison Medical
Filing
50
ORDER UPDATING DOCKET AND FOR ASSIGNMENT OF DISTRICT JUDGE RE 39 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/11/2017. Case randomly assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd. The new case number is 1:14-cv-00092-DAD-EPG-(PC). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GORDON BULLOCK,
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
14
BROCK SNEELA, et al.
15
Case No. 1:14-cv-00092-EPG-PC
ORDER UPDATING DOCKET AND
FOR ASSIGNMENT OF DISTRICT
JUDGE
Defendants.
(ECF No. 39)
16
Plaintiff Gordon Bullock is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action
17
alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2017, the Court held a telephonic
18
scheduling conference. Plaintiff appeared telephonically. R. Lawrence Bragg appeared
19
telephonically for Defendants. At the conference, Plaintiff informed the Court that he would
20
like to withdraw his Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39) without prejudice to re-file
21
the motion at a later date. Defendants did not oppose this request. Plaintiff’s request to
22
withdraw his motion without prejudice is thus GRANTED.
23
24
Defendants requested that the Court update the docket to reflect the correct spelling of
Defendant Brock Sneela’s name. The correct spelling is “Brock Sheela.” The Clerk of the
25
Court is DIRECTED to update the docket accordingly.
26
Finally, Defendants were directed to file their consent/decline to magistrate judge
27
jurisdiction form no later than April 13, 2017. On April 11, 2017, Defendants filed a notice
28
1
1
indicating that they have declined magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 49.) Accordingly, the
2
Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to assign a Fresno district judge to this case.
3
4
A scheduling order setting forth the deadlines in this case will follow the assignment of
a district judge.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 11, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?