Clymore, et al v. Federal Railroad Administration et al

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Request for a Jury Trial, document 8 . Orders signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/3/2014. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 RICHARD CLYMORE; AND, DEBRA HARBIN-CLYMORE, 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION; CHARLES MARK HAGOOD; AND, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL. (Doc. No. 8) Defendants. 15 16 Case No. 1:14-CV-0101-AWI-SMS Before the Court in the above-styled and numbered cause of action is Defendants’ “Notice of Motion and United States’ Motion to Strike Jury Demand,” filed April 4, 2014 (Doc. 8). 18 19 Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks damages for negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act (Doc. 1). 20 Defendant argues, and the Court agrees, that there is no federal right to a jury trial in a case brought 21 under the FTCA. 28 U.S.C. § 2402. Because Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, (see Doc. 11), 22 and there is no federal right to a jury trial, the Court will strike Plaintiff’s demand pursuant to Rule 23 39(a)(2). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Doc. 8) is 24 GRANTED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: December 3, 2014 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?