Ruiz v. Fresno Superior Court

Filing 5

ORDER VACATING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Re-Serve Petitioner With New Case Documents signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/29/2014. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE RUIZ, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:14-cv-00112 LJO GSA HC Petitioner, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #4] v. FRESNO SUPERIOR COURT, 15 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RE-SERVE PETITIONER WITH NEW CASE DOCUMENTS Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 On January 27, 2014, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On January 28, 20 2014, the Clerk of Court served an order authorizing in forma pauperis status and an order 21 regarding consent on Petitioner. On February 6, 2014, the orders served on Petitioner were 22 returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. On April 22, 2014, the Court issued a 23 Findings and Recommendation which had recommended the petition be dismissed for failure to 24 comply with a court order. 25 It has come to the Court’s attention that Petitioner’s CDC number was incorrectly 26 recorded on the case docket. Therefore, the new case documents were not properly served on 27 Petitioner. The Court will order the documents re-served using the correct CDC number for 28 Petitioner. 1 ORDER 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 3 1) The Findings and Recommendation issued April 22, 2014, is hereby VACATED; and 4 2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to re-serve the new case documents on Petitioner 5 along with this order. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 29, 2014 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?