Harper v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 24

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunctive Relief (ECF Nos. 16 & 19 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/4/2014. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12

JASON S. HARPER,

13
14
15
16
17

Case No. 1:14-cv-00115-AWI-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION
FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,
et al.,

ECF Nos. 16 and 19

Defendants.

18
19

Plaintiff Jason S. Harper is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

20 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
21 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
22

On July 7, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations

23 recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied, with prejudice.
24 (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff did not respond.
25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28

1

1 analysis.
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

3

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 7, 2014, are adopted in full and

4

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 16) is DENIED, with

5

prejudice.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 Dated: September 4, 2014

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2