Harper v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
40
ORDER Granting 34 Motion to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/20/14. Nunc Pro Tunc. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JASON S. HARPER,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00115-AWI-MJS (PC)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
(ECF No. 34)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
16
17
Defendants.
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
19
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against
20
Defendants Curry, Huffman, and Rivero on Plaintiff’s First and Eighth Amendment
21
claims. (ECF No. 12.)
22
On October 2, 2014, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order setting
23
January 2, 2015 as the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment on the basis of
24
failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 28.) On December 31, 2014,
25
Defendants filed a motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order and to extend
26
the exhaustion motion filing deadline to January 12, 2015. (ECF No. 34.) Defendants
27
then filed their exhaustion motion on January 12, 2015. (ECF No. 35.)
28
1
1
Defendants have presented good cause for modifying the discovery and
2
scheduling order to extend the exhaustion motion deadline. Accordingly, their motion
3
(ECF No. 34) is HEREBY GRANTED. The deadline for filing motions for summary
4
judgment on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies is extended nunc pro
5
tunc to and including January 12, 2015.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 20, 2015
/s/
9
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?