Horisons Unlimited v. Santa Cruz-Monterey-Merced Managed Medical Care Commission, et al

Filing 29

Stipulation To Continue Initial Scheduling Conference to July 31, 2014 at 10:00 AM in Yosemite (MJS) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/14/2014. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Daniel O. Jamison, Esq. #76880 Christopher E. Seymour, Esq. # 126330 DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED 8080 N. Palm Avenue Third Floor Fresno, CA 93711 559-432-4500 Tel. 559-432-4590 Fax djamison@dowlingaaron.com; cseymour@dowlingaaron.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Horisons Unlimited, a California nonprofit corporation, and Horisons Unlimited Health Care, a California Corporation, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 Santa Cruz-Monterey-Merced Managed Medical Care Commission dba Central California Alliance for Health; County of Merced; The Board of Supervisors of the County of Merced and the Individual Members Thereof, 16 17 18 Case No. 1:14-cv-00123 LJO/MJS STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MAY 8, 2014 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND RELATED FED. R. CIV. PROC. RULE 26 DATES AND ORDER THEREON DATE: May 8, 2014 TIME: 10:00 a.m. CRTM: 6 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1098724.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 The parties hereto, by and through the undersigned, hereby stipulate and agree 2 that the Court may enter an order continuing the presently scheduled May 8, 2014 Scheduling 3 Conference, the due date of the Fed. Rules of Civ. Procedure Rule 26(a) for exchange of Initial 4 Disclosures, and the due date for the Joint Scheduling Report, as follows: 5 1. Date for Scheduling Conference: 45 days following the addition of parties 6 to the action, if any, and the completion of the pleadings, meaning the last answer to the last 7 counterclaim, if any, or last answer to a third party complaint, if any, whichever is later. 8 9 2. days following the aforementioned completion of the pleadings; and 10 11 3. The parties further stipulate and agree that this stipulation is offered to the Court upon the following grounds: 14 15 1. 2. There are currently pending motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) brought by both defendants and scheduled to be heard on April 28, 2014. 18 19 On April 8, 2014, the attorneys for the parties held a lengthy Rule 26(f) conference. 16 17 The due date for the parties’ Joint Scheduling Report be set for 7 days prior to the continued date for the Scheduling Conference. 12 13 The due date for Initial Disclosures under Rule 26(a) be continued to 30 3. There is also pending the County of Merced’s Motion for Sanctions under Rule 11 scheduled to be heard on May 15, 2014. 20 4. At the Rule 26(f) conference, counsel for defendants asserted that the State 21 of California and the United States of America must be added as parties to the action should the 22 action survive the pending motions to dismiss. 23 5. At the Rule 26(f) conference counsel for Santa Cruz-Monterey-Merced 24 Managed Medical Care Commission stated he expects to file one or more counterclaims should 25 the action survive the pending motions to dismiss. 26 27 28 1098724.1 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED 1 2 Dated: April 14, 2014 By: /s/Daniel O. Jamison________________ Daniel O. Jamison Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: April 14, 2014 By: /s/Roger S. Matzkind______________ Roger S. Matzkind, Esq., Attorneys for County of Merced 3 4 5 6 7 8 WILKE FLEURY HOFFELT GOULD & BIRNEY LLP 9 10 11 Dated: April 11, 2014 12 13 By: /s/Anthony R. Eaton___________________ Anthony R. Eaton, Esq. Attorneys for Santa Cruz-Monterey-Merced Managed Medical Care Commission dba Central California Alliance for Health 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing, the Initial Scheduling 19 Conference set for May 8, 2014 at 10:00 am is CONTINUED to July 31, 2014 at 10:00 am 20 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 25 April 14, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1098724.1 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 W:\NETDRIVE\wdocs\maindocs\16082\001\01512212.DOCX 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1098724.1 4 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?