Washington et al v. Fresno County Sheriff et al

Filing 121

ORDER Re Stipulation to Continue Reply Deadline and Continuing Oral Argument on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to December 6, 2017, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/20/2017: 1. Defendant Velos' reply shall be filed on or before December 1, 2017; and 2. The hearing set for November 29, 2017, is continued to December 6, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PERRY WASHINGTON, et al, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:14-cv-00129-SAB ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REPLY DEADLINE AND CONTINUING ORAL ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DECEMBER 6, 2017 v. FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 15 (ECF No. 119) 16 17 18 Defendant Velos filed a motion for summary judgment which is currently set for oral 19 argument on November 29, 2017. Plaintiff Washington filed an opposition to the motion for 20 summary judgment on November 14, 2017. Upon review of the opposition, the Court ordered a 21 supplemental opposition to be filed by November 20, 2017; and the deadline for Defendant to 22 file a reply was extended to November 27, 2017. 23 On November 17, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to continue the deadline for 24 Defendant Velos to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. The Court shall approve the stipulation of the 25 parties and the hearing on the motion shall be continued one week to accommodate the reply 26 deadline. 27 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. Defendant Velos’ reply shall be filed on or before December 1, 2017; and 1 2. 1 The hearing set for November 29, 2017, is continued to December 6, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: November 20, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?