Washington et al v. Fresno County Sheriff et al

Filing 138

ORDER REGARDING Procedures Related to Evidentiary Hearing on Exhaustion signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/21/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PERRY WASHINGTON, et al, Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES RELATED TO EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON EXHAUSTION v. 13 14 Case No. 1:14-cv-00129-SAB FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff Perry Washington’s claims against Defendant 18 Veloz alleging deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment and retaliation in 19 violation of the First Amendment. Defendant’s filed a motion for summary judgment which was 20 denied on December 6, 2017. Defendant filed a motion for reconsider which the Court has 21 granted in an order filed concurrently with the instant order. An evidentiary hearing has been set 22 before the undersigned on April 10, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. on the issue of whether Plaintiff 23 exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing this action. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 24 1162, 1170 (9th Cir. 2014). 25 As addressed in the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of 26 Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternately for Albino Hearing Re Summary Judgment and 27 Setting Evidentiary Hearing, the Court will hear evidence on the following issues during the 28 hearing: 1 1 1. at Fresno County Jail; 2 3 2. 3. 4. 10 Whether Defendant Veloz threatened Plaintiff and offered him a bribe to drop his grievance; and 8 9 Whether Plaintiff thereafter attempted to grieve the alleged acts through Internal Affairs; 6 7 Whether jail officials refused to accept Plaintiff’s grievance against Defendant Veloz; 4 5 Whether Plaintiff was provided with an inmate handbook upon his incarceration 5. Whether Plaintiff withdrew his grievance against Defendant Veloz. A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for Plaintiff will be issued as the 11 hearing approaches. The parties shall arrange to bring and present their witnesses and evidence 12 during the evidentiary hearing. 13 Any unincarcerated witnesses may appear voluntarily without further order of the Court. 14 To the extent that the parties seek to have incarcerated witnesses appear for the evidentiary 15 hearing, all motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses must be filed on or before 16 March 9, 2018. The witnesses must have relevant evidence regarding the issues described above. 17 The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of Witnesses.” The motion must: (1) state the 18 name, address, and prison identification number (if any) of each witness to be called; (2) explain 19 what relevant information each witness has, and how that witness has personal knowledge of the 20 relevant information; and (3) state whether each such witness is willing to voluntarily testify. Any 21 opposition to a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses must be filed on or before March 22 14, 2018. 23 No later than March 13, 2018, the parties shall confer regarding the witnesses to be called 24 and the evidence to be presented at the hearing. No later than April 3, 2018, each party shall file 25 and serve a witness list. The parties shall be prepared to submit exhibits in proper form at the 26 evidentiary hearing, with proper foundation. The original and two copies of all exhibits, along 27 with exhibit lists, shall be submitted to Courtroom Deputy Mamie Hernandez no later than April 28 3, 2018. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be pre-marked using numbers beginning with 1 (e.g., 1, 2, 2 1 etc.). Defendants’ exhibits must be pre-marked using letters beginning with A (e.g., A, B, C … 2 AA, BB, CC … AAA, BBB, CCC, etc.). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: February 21, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?