Cranford v. Wyatt
Filing
14
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 01/21/15. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ARCHIE CRANFORD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:14-cv-00136 DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR DISCOVERY
v.
[ECF No. 11]
14
KIM WYATT,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff Archie Cranford (“Plaintiff”), a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma
17
18
pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 31, 2014.1
On October 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to open discovery. Plaintiff is advised
19
20
that the Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a
21
governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The
22
Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally
23
“frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek
24
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2).
25
“Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall
26
dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a
27
claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). In this case, the Court has
28
1
Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge on February 7, 2014.
1
1
2
not yet screened the complaint, and service on Defendant has not yet been authorized. Therefore,
Plaintiff’s motion for discovery is premature.
3
4
ORDER
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for discovery is DENIED.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
January 21, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?