Hanna v. County of Fresno et al

Filing 80

ORDER GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART Request to MODIFY the Scheduling Order. The deadlines are modified as follows: Non Expert Discovery: 2/8/2016; Expert Disclosure: 2/29/2016; Sup. Expert Disclosures: 3/25/2016; Expert Discove ry: 5/27/2016. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filing 6/20/2016; Hearing 7/20/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadlines Remain As: Filing 6/20/2016; Hearing 7/20/2016. Settlement Conference reset for 4/8/2016, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Pre-Trial Conference remains set for 8/31/2016. Trial remains set for 10/12/2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/7/2015. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DOMINIC HANNA, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., 9 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-00142 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER 10 On September 9, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to modify the 11 scheduling order. (Doc. 78.) The parties maintain a schedule modification is 12 necessary because discovery has been significantly complicated by the extreme 13 physical limitations of Plaintiff. 14 Plaintiff is currently housed at the Golden Cross assisted living facility 15 under the care of a physician. Among many other limitations, Plaintiff cannot 16 hold a document in his hand and for him to read anything, a document must be 17 held for him. His voice is very soft and his speech is low, thus conversations with 18 him take far longer than with an unimpaired individual. Due to these limitations, 19 preparation for his deposition will require an extended period of time, and his 7- 20 hour deposition will probably require three or four days. Plaintiff also needs to 21 take approximately five additional depositions following Plaintiff's September 22, 22 23 1 Order re Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Dominic Hanna v. County of Fresno, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00142 LJO/SKO 1 2015, deposition. The parties have thus requested that all remaining deadlines 2 be extended approximately 60 days. 3 Although the parties have established that additional time is necessary to 4 prepare for and conduct Plaintiff's deposition, there is no good cause stated to 5 modify the entire schedule of deadlines. The Court will grant the parties an 6 additional 30 days in light of the additional time needed to prepare for and take 7 Plaintiff's deposition, but a wholesale continuance of all deadlines is denied. 8 9 10 11 12 13 Accordingly, the deadlines are modified as set forth below. Discovery Deadlines: Non Expert Discovery: February 8, 2016 Expert Disclosure: February 29, 2016 Sup. Expert Disclosures: March 25, 2016 Expert Discovery: May 27, 2016 Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 14 Filing: 15 16 June 20, 2016 Hearing: July 20, 2016 Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 17 Filing: June 20, 2016 18 Hearing: July 20, 2016 19 20 Settlement Conference: April 8, 2016, 10 a.m., Courtroom 6, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Seng 21 22 23 2 Order re Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Dominic Hanna v. County of Fresno, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00142 LJO/SKO 1 Pre-Trial Conference: 2 August 31, 2016 3 Trial: October 12, 2016 4 5 The deadlines and dates pertaining to dispositive motions, the Pretrial Conference, and the Trial have not been modified. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 7, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3 Order re Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order; Dominic Hanna v. County of Fresno, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00142 LJO/SKO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?