Coston v. Clark et al

Filing 17

ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/18/15. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL MURPHY COSTON, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00148-MJS (PC) ORDER DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE ORDER TO v. (ECF No. 15) E. CLARK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 31, 2015, Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, but he was given leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) The thirty day deadline passed without Plaintiff either filing an amended pleading or seeking an extension of time to do so. On May 15, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why the action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 15.) Almost simultaneously with the order to show cause, Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 14), dated April 24, 2015, was docketed. Based on Plaintiff’s timely submission of the second amended complaint, the 1 order to show cause (ECF No. 15), filed May 15, 2015, is HEREBY DISCHARGED. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2015 /s/ 5 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?