Tate et al v. County of Kern et al

Filing 27

ORDER GRANTING 26 Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order re Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/8/2014. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN TATE, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 v. COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-00159 - LJO - JLT ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER RE: AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 26) 16 17 Before the Court is the stipulation of the parties to allow Plaintiffs to file an amended 18 complaint to name Jill Christopher as a defendant in this matter. (Doc. 26) Counsel agree that 19 Plaintiffs may file the amended complaint related to Ms. Christopher no later than October 31, 2014. 20 Id. at 2. Likewise, counsel agree that such an amendment may be filed ex parte. Id. However, they 21 offer no justification explaining why such an amendment should be filed without notice to the parties 22 or how this would or could occur, given that the Court’s electronic filing system which automatically 23 e-serves all filed documents to all parties. Likewise, they fail to explain how the parties may 24 “reserv[e] and not hereby waiv[e] any arguments and/or objections” but also require them to file a 25 non-opposition to the amended complaint. Id. at 2, 3. Thus, doing its best to construe the parties’ 26 intent, the Court ORDERS: 27 28 1. The scheduling conference order (Doc. 22) is amended to allow Plaintiffs until October 31, 2014 to file a motion to amend the complaint related to Jill Christopher or to file a stipulation to 1 1 file an amended complaint related to Jill Christopher. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2014 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?