Tate et al v. County of Kern et al

Filing 39

ORDER Dismissing Case Based Upon Stipulation of All Parties, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/1/14. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB# 159747
DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ.
CSB# 236458
BRETT O. TERRY, ESQ.
CSB# 270694
LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT R. POWELL
925 West Hedding Street
San Jose, California 95126
[phone] Telephone
[phone] Facsimile
E: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ALLEN TATE and MARYN TATE,

Case No. CV14-00159 LJO (JLT)

11

Plaintiffs,

12

vs.

13
14
15
16

COUNTY OF KERN, SUSAN RUTLEDGE,
MARLENE HERNANDEZ, KRISTY
POWERS-STACY, SHIELA MUNIS and
DOES 1-10 inclusive,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE BASED
UPON STIPULATION OF ALL
PARTIES

Defendants.

17
18

Based on the stipulation of the parties submitted December 1, 2014, and good cause

19
20

appearing therefore, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties and makes the same

21

the order of this Court:

22
23

//
//

24

//
25
1
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Order Granting Stipulation for Dismissal
Tate v. County of Kern, et al.
U.S. Eastern District Court
Case No. CV14-00159 LJO (JLT)

Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants COUNTY OF KERN, SUSAN RUTLEDGE,

1

1.

2

MARLENE HERNANDEZ, KRISTY POWERS-STACY, SHIELA MUNIS, and JILL

3

CHRISTOPHER are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear his or her own

4

costs and attorneys’ fees.

5

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9

Dated:

December 1, 2014

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Order Granting Stipulation for Dismissal
Tate v. County of Kern, et al.
U.S. Eastern District Court
Case No. CV14-00159 LJO (JLT)