Azua, Jr. v. City of Parlier

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Designation of Expert Witnesses deadline to 6/30/2015 and the Discovery deadline to 7/15/2015. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/21/2015. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com SAM STEFANKI (CA SBN 293330) SStefanki@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 10 SEAN P. GATES (CA SBN 186247) SGates@mofo.com DEBRA URTEAGA (CA SBN 278744) DUrteaga@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 707 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017-3543 Telephone: 213.892.5200 Facsimile: 213.892.5454 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 BRUCE D. PRAET (CA SBN 119430) FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN A Professional Corporation 1631 East 18th Street Santa Ana, California 92705 Telephone: 714.953.5300 Facsimile: 714.953.1143 bpraet@aol.com 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 Attorney for Defendants 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 FRESNO DIVISION 21 22 NORBERTO AZUA, JR. Plaintiff, 23 24 25 26 v. Case No. 1:14-CV-00198-AWI-SMS JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF CITY OF PARLIER, a municipal corporation; JONATHAN PIERRO, in his individual capacity; ADOLFO JIMENEZ, in his individual capacity; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 27 Defendants. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY CASE NO. 1:14-CV-00198-AWI-SMS la-1287267 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 143, 144(a), and the Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF # 10), 2 Plaintiff Norberto Azua and Defendants Parlier Police Department, Jonathan Pierro, and Adolfo 3 Jimenez (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS the Parties mutually desire an extension of the expert disclosure deadline 5 from June 5, 2015 to June 30, 2015, so that the Parties may have the opportunity to confer about 6 a possible resolution of this matter before incurring additional costs. 7 WHEREAS the Parties mutually desire an extension of the discovery cut-off date from 8 June 30, 2015 to July 15, 2015, so that the Parties may have the opportunity to confer about a 9 possible resolution of this matter before incurring additional costs. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS this extension of time will not interfere with the pre-trial conference set August 20, 2015. WHEREAS this extension of time will not interfere with the trial date in this case set for September 22, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. WHEREAS the Parties have sought, requested, and obtained an extension of time for the expert disclosure deadline and discovery cut-off date on March 30, 2015. WHEREAS all other requirements contained in the Court’s prior scheduling order shall remain in effect and unchanged. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective 19 counsel, that the dates pertaining to expert disclosures and discovery cut-off are hereby 20 rescheduled for June 30, 2015 and July 15, 2015, respectively. 21 22 23 Dated: May 20, 2015 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ DEBRA URTEAGA SAM STEFANKI MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 24 25 26 By: /s/ Sean P. Gates SEAN P. GATES Attorneys for Plaintiff 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY CASE NO. 1:14-CV-00198-AWI-SMS la-1287267 1 1 Dated: May 20, 2015 2 BRUCE D. PRAET FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN A Professional Corporation 3 4 By: /s/ Bruce D. Praet [authorized May 20, 2015] BRUCE D. PRAET Attorney for Defendants 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: 5/21/2015 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATES FOR EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY CASE NO. 1:14-CV-00198-AWI-SMS la-1287267 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?