Gray v. County of Kern

Filing 65

ORDER RE FURTHER PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 23, 2018. Pretrial Conference set for 5/21/2018 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Arthur Gray,

11
12
13
14
15

Case: 1:14-CV-00204-LJO-JLT

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER RE FURTHER
PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS AND
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE

County of Kern; and Does 1-10,
Inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

The Court hereby adopts the parties’ proposed revised schedule in part and

20
21

modifies the remaining pretrial deadlines as follows:

22
23

DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

24

Matter
Opening Briefs
Opposition Briefs
Reply
Hearing (if needed)

25
26
27
28

Time

8:30 a.m.

Date
April 30, 2018
May 14, 2018
May 21, 2018
May 28, 2018

1
ORDER

Case: 1:14-CV-00204-LJO-JLT

1

PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL DATES

2
3

Matter
Plaintiff’s Expert Rebuttal Reports
Defendant’s Expert Rebuttal Reports
Last Day to Conduct Supplemental
Expert Discovery
File Joint Pretrial Conference
Statement1
Pre-trial Conference

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Dated:

May 16, 2018
May 21, 2018 at 1:00pm

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

Date
April 27, 2018
May 4, 2018
May 10, 2018

12

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

April 23, 2018

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Parties’ proposed schedule set forth dates for the filing of pretrial disclosures and objections thereto.
Presumably, the Parties were referring to the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3). In this District,
the pretrial conference statement disclosures required by Local Rule 281 satisfy and supersede the requirements of
Rule 26(a)(3). See Local Rule 281(d). The Parties are also reminded that in this Court, the pretrial statement must
be filed jointly. See ECF No. 3-1 at ¶3. .

2
ORDER

Case: 1:14-CV-00204-LJO-JLT