Gray v. County of Kern

Filing 8

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/30/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 6/11/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 8/15/2014. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 6/13/2014; Non-Expert 4/13/2015; Expert 6/29/2015. < i>Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 2/6/2015 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 7/13/2015; Hearing by 8/10/2015. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 8/25/2015; Hearing by 10/6/2015. Settlement Conference set for 4/27/2015 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 12/1/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 1/26/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ARTHUR GRAY,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 14-CV-00204 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 8/15/2014
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 6/13/2014
Non-Expert: 4/13/2015
Expert: 6/29/2015
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
2/6/2015 at 8:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 7/13/2015
Hearing: 8/10/2015

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/25/2015
Hearing: 10/6/2015

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
4/27/2015 at 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

23
24

26

Pre-Trial Conference:
12/1/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

27

Trial:

25

28
1

1/26/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 3-5 days

1

I.

May 30, 2014.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Ray Ballister appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Judith Denny appeared on behalf of Defendant.

6

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

7

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

8

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

9

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

10

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

11

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

12

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

13
14

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

15

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

16

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

17

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

18

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

19
20

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

21

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

22

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

23

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

24
25

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

26

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

27

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

28

///
2

1

IV.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

2
3

motion to amend, no later than August 15, 2014.

4

V.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

5

The parties agree that each side may propound 40 interrogatories.

6

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

7
8
9

on or before June 13, 2014.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before April
13, 2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before June 29, 2015.

10

The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before April 27, 2015,

11

and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before May 26, 2015. The written designation of retained and

12

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

13

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

14

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

15

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

16

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

17

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

18

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

19

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

20
21
22

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for February 6, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before the

23

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

24

California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed

25

by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall

26

be e-mailed, in Word format, to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the

27

discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to

28

completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via
3

1

CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk

2

no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

3

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

4
5

than July 13, 2015, and heard on or before August 10, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are heard before

6

the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

7

Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

8
9

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

10

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

11

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

12

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

13

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

14

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

15

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

16

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

17
18

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

19

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

20
21

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

22

before the noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than August 25, 2015, and heard no later

23
24

than October 6, 2015, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

25

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

26

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

27

VII.

28

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary adjudication the parties
4

1

are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the

2

motion at least 21 days before the filing of the motion.

3

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

4

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

5

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

6

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

7

expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.

8

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and provide a draft of the joint statement of

9

undisputed facts. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file a

10

joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as

11
12

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

13

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

14

December 1, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

15

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

16

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

17

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

18
19

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

20

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

21

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

22

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

23

IX.

24
25

Trial Date
January 26, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

United States District Court Judge.

26

A.

This is a jury trial.

27

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-5 days.

28
5

C.

1

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

2

California, Rule 285.

3

X.

Settlement Conference

4

A Settlement Conference is scheduled for April 27, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., located at 510 19th

5

Street, Bakersfield, California. The settlement conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge

6

Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer

7

who is not normally assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify the Court no later than

8

60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient time for another

9

judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.

10

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

11

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

12

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms1 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

13

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

14

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

15

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

16

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful2 settlement demand which includes a

17

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

18

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

19

with a meaningful counteroffer and which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is

20

appropriate.

21
22

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of the party’s settlement offer to
their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
2
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

6

1

shall not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

2

At least five court days prior to the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

3
4

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

5

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

6

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

7

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

8

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

9
10

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

11

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

12

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

13

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

14

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

15

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

16

E.

The relief sought.

17

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

18
19

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

20

Techniques to Shorten Trial

21

Not applicable at this time.

22
23
24
25

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

26

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

27

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

28

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided
7

1

in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

2

California.

3

XIV. Effect of this Order

4

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

5

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

6

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

7

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

8

subsequent status conference.

9

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

10

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

11

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

12

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

13

for granting the relief requested.

14

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

15
16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 30, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8