Linenbroker v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Filing
34
ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal of Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/6/15: This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
2 David R. McNamara, #133302
Deborah A. Byron, #105327
3 7647 North Fresno Street
Fresno, California 93720
4 Telephone:
(559) 433-1300
Facsimile:
(559) 433-2300
5
Attorneys for ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,
6 INC. DBA ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11 SCOTT LINENBROKER, an individual,
Case No. 1:14-CV-00207-LJO-GSA
12
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION; ORDER
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. dba
ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, a California
15 Corporation and DOES 1-50,
16
Defendants.
Trial Date: October 27, 2015
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff SCOTT LINENBROKER and
19 Defendant ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. dba ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, a California
20 Corporation, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal
21 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its
22 entirety.
23 Dated: May 6, 2015
MICHAEL J.F. SMITH,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
24
25
26
27
/S/ MICHAEL J.F. SMITH
Michael J.F.Smith
Attorneys for Plaintiff SCOTT LINENBROKER
By:
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
1 Dated: May 5, 2015
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
2
3
/S/ DAVID R. McNAMARA
David R. McNamara
Deborah A. Byron
Attorneys for Defendant ITT EDUCATIONAL
SERVICES, INC. dba ITT TECHNICAL
INSTITUTE
By:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
11
12
The parties having so stipulated,
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
May 6, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
3
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am
employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. My business address is 7647 North Fresno
4 Street, Fresno, CA 93720.
5
On April __, 2015, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER on the interested
6 parties in this action as follows:
7
8
9
MICHAEL J.F. SMITH
Michael J.F. Smith,
A Professional Corporation
1391 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite D
Fresno, California 93711
Email: mjfsmith@mjfsmith.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, Scott Linenbroker
10
BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the
11 persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and mailing,
following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s practice for
12 collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that the correspondence is
placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United
13 States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
14
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court
15 at whose direction the service was made.
16
Executed on April __, 2015, at Fresno, California.
17
18
Lisa Hammond
19
45205-00002 3345169.1
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?