Linenbroker v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal of Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/6/15: This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP 2 David R. McNamara, #133302 Deborah A. Byron, #105327 3 7647 North Fresno Street Fresno, California 93720 4 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 5 Attorneys for ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, 6 INC. DBA ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 SCOTT LINENBROKER, an individual, Case No. 1:14-CV-00207-LJO-GSA 12 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. dba ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, a California 15 Corporation and DOES 1-50, 16 Defendants. Trial Date: October 27, 2015 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff SCOTT LINENBROKER and 19 Defendant ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. dba ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, a California 20 Corporation, the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its 22 entirety. 23 Dated: May 6, 2015 MICHAEL J.F. SMITH, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 24 25 26 27 /S/ MICHAEL J.F. SMITH Michael J.F.Smith Attorneys for Plaintiff SCOTT LINENBROKER By: 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER 1 Dated: May 5, 2015 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 2 3 /S/ DAVID R. McNAMARA David R. McNamara Deborah A. Byron Attorneys for Defendant ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. dba ITT TECHNICAL INSTITUTE By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORDER 11 12 The parties having so stipulated, 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill May 6, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO 3 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. My business address is 7647 North Fresno 4 Street, Fresno, CA 93720. 5 On April __, 2015, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER on the interested 6 parties in this action as follows: 7 8 9 MICHAEL J.F. SMITH Michael J.F. Smith, A Professional Corporation 1391 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite D Fresno, California 93711 Email: mjfsmith@mjfsmith.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Scott Linenbroker 10 BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the 11 persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business’s practice for 12 collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that the correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United 13 States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court 15 at whose direction the service was made. 16 Executed on April __, 2015, at Fresno, California. 17 18 Lisa Hammond 19 45205-00002 3345169.1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?