Salazar v. Kokor et al

Filing 51

ORDER DENYING 50 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/19/2018. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 1:14-cv-00211-AWI-MJS (PC) EFRAIN SALAZAR, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL v. (ECF No. 50) DR. KOKOR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 On January 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(1), Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. However, without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the Court will seek volunteer counsel 26 only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In determining whether exceptional 27 circumstances exist, the district court must evaluate both the likelihood of success of the 28 1 1 merits [and] the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the 2 complexity of the legal issues involved. Id. (internal quotation marks and citations 3 omitted). 4 In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional 5 circumstances. Even if it is assumed that Plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that 6 he has made serious allegations which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is 7 not exceptional. This Court is faced with similar cases almost daily. Further, the Court 8 cannot make a determination that Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. And, based 9 on a review of the record in this case, even though the issues are complex, the court 10 11 12 does not find that Plaintiff cannot adequately articulate his claims. Id. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff=s motion for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY DENIED, without prejudice. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: January 19, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael J. Seng 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?