Sepeda v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File an Amended Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/25/2014. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEANETTE SEPEDA,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-00228 - JLT
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN
AMENDED MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
Jeanette Sepeda (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of an administrative decision denying her
18
claim for Social Security benefits. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis
19
with her complaint on February 20, 2014. (Doc. 2.)
20
The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees “but a
21
person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such person . . . possesses [and]
22
that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Court
23
has reviewed the application and the information provided is insufficient to determine whether Plaintiff
24
satisfies the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
25
According to her application, Plaintiff has not been employed since 1976, and has no cash or
26
savings. (Doc. 2 at 1-2.) Plaintiff asserts her only income includes $245 per month for General
27
Assistance and $198 in food stamps. Id. at 1. Further, Plaintiff notes she does not have any real
28
estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, an automobile, or other things of value.
1
1
Id. Given this economic condition, it does not appear that Plaintiff is able to support herself on these
2
funds alone. Consequently, the Court must determine whether Plaintiff is dependent upon another
3
individual who would be able to pay the filing fee.
4
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file, within fourteen days of this order, an application
5
that includes information on how Plaintiff is supporting herself, or whether she is dependent upon
6
another. Upon receipt of this information, the Court will resume consideration of Plaintiff’s motion to
7
proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in
8
denial of her application to proceed in forma pauperis.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 25, 2014
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?