Donaldson v. Kern County et al
Filing
52
ORDER for Additional Briefing on Plaintiff's 51 Motion For Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Ruling on Motion to Amend, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/13/2015. ((1) Plaintiff must submit ADDITIONAL BRIEFING on the matters described above within 14 days; and (2) Defendants can respond to this and file an OPPOSITION within 7 days after Plaintiff files the aforementioned additional briefing.)(Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CHRISTINE DONALDSON,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1:14-cv-00257-AWI-JLT
Plaintiff,
v.
KERN COUNTY, OFFICER BRENDA
GRAVES, OFFICER PHILLIP ROMERO,
OFFICER MISTY ISAAC, OFFICER
FRANCES PERKINS, and DOE 1-10,
inclusive,
ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL
BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING
ON MOTION TO AMEND
(Doc. 51)
Defendants.
__________________________________/
18
19
Plaintiff Christine Donaldson brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged
20 illegal strip search, retaliation, and denial of medical care against Defendants Kern County,
21 Officer Brenda Graves, Officer Phillip Romero, Officer Misty Isaac, Officer Frances Perkins,
22 and Doe 1-10. Doc. 21. On April 22, 2015, Donaldson filed a Motion to Modify the Scheduling
23 Order for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint.
Doc. 40.
The proposed Second
24 Amended Complaint adds defendants Kathe Lundgren and Doe Nurse 1 as well as allegations
25
26
1
1
2 related to these two defendants. Doc. 41-1. On May 22, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued an
3 order denying leave to amend. Doc. 48. In the instant motion, Donaldson seeks reconsideration
4 of the Magistrate Judge’s May 22, 2015 order. Doc. 51. To date Defendants have not filed an
5 opposition.
6
On March 25, 2015, the parties conducted a deposition of Kathe Lundgren. In Exhibit 3
7 to this deposition, pages Bates stamped KC 66-67 contain the paragraphs:
8
14
“Lundgren said she wrote a referral for Donaldson to see an
Ophthalmologist at a later time, but there was no immediate need to send
Donaldson to Kern Medical Center. Lundgren explained to Donaldson that she
would be unable to see an eye specialist at that time because it was Saturday and
there was none working. Lundgren said Donaldson only had irritated eye and was
responding well to eye irrigation.
Lundgren said she also told Donaldson that the emergency room doctor
would not be able to provide treatment, beyond what she was receiving at the
Lerdo Pre-Trial Infirmary.
I told Lundgren about Donaldson’s allegations that she (Lundgren)
determined she needed to go to Kern Medical Center, but a detentions deputy
refused to allow her to go and receive treatment. I asked Lundgren if this
occurred and if she ever told Donaldson to call an attorney. Lundgren said this
did not happen and she did not tell Donaldson to call an attorney.”
15
Lundgren Depo., Exh. 3. The Court now orders Donaldson to clarify when this document
9
10
11
12
13
16 was turned over to her and her attorneys, and to clarify if it was part of the discovery turned over
17 on November 11, 2014. The Court also invites Donaldson to file additional briefing responding
18 to how the pages Bates stamped KC 66-67 affect her motion for reconsideration, in light of her
19 assertion that “there was no information prior to March 25, 2015 that Ms. Lundgren had herself
20 denied, delayed or interfered with Ms. Lundgren’s medical treatment as required by case law.
21 Once Ms. Lundgren testified that it was she herself who refused to send Ms. Donaldson for an
22 immediate consultation with an ophthalmologist, plaintiff promptly sought to include a claim
23 against her shortly thereafter.” Doc. 51, 8:6-11.
24
25
26
2
1
2
ORDER
3
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
5
6
7
(1) Plaintiff must submit ADDITIONAL BRIEFING on the matters described above within
14 days; and
(2) Defendants can respond to this and file an OPPOSITION within 7 days after Plaintiff
files the aforementioned additional briefing.
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 Dated: August 13, 2015
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?