Ahmadi v. United Continental Holdings, Inc.

Filing 22

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/15/2014. Consent/Decline Deadline 9/25/2014. Pleading Amendment Deadline 12/15/2014. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 9/29/2014; Non-Expert 2/10/2015; Expert 4/28/2015. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 12/15/2014 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 5/11/2015; Hearing by 6/8/2015. Dispositive Motion D eadlines: Filed by 6/23/2015; Hearing by 8/4/2015. Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 12/1/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

SARA AHMADI,
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS,
INC., doing business as UNITED AIRLINE,

14

Defendant.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 14-CV-00264 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 12/15/2014
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 9/29/2014
Non-Expert: 2/10/2015
Expert: 4/28/2015
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
12/15/2014 at 9:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 5/11/2015
Hearing: 6/8/2015

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 6/23/2015
Hearing: 8/4/2015

20
21
22

Pre-Trial Conference:
9/29/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

23
24

Trial:

25
26
27
28

I.

Date of Scheduling Conference
September 15, 2014.
1

12/1/2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 3-5 days

1

II.

Appearances of Counsel

2

Salim Khawaja appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

3

Jacqueline DeWarr appeared on behalf of Defendant.

4

III.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

5

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

6

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of

7

the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set

8

before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older

9

civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a

10

continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

11
12

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

13

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

14

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

15

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

16

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

17
18

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

19

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

20

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

21

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

22
23

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

24

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

25

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

26

IV.

27
28

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

motion to amend, no later than December 15, 2014.
2

1

V.

The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

2
3

on or before September 29, 2014.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before

4
5

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

February 10, 2015, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before April 28, 2015.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before February 24,

6
7

2015, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before March 24, 2015. The written designation of

8

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

9

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder.1 Failure to designate experts in

10

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

11

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

12
13

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

14

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

15

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement

16
17

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for December 15, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. before the

18
19

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

20

California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed

21

by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall

22

be e-mailed, in Word format, to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the

23

discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to

24

completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via

25

CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk

26

no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.

27
1

28

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, this examination
SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s opinions in
this regard.

3

1

VI.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

2
3

than May 11, 2015, and heard on or before June 8, 2015. Non-dispositive motions are heard before the

4

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in

5

Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

6
7

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

8

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

9

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

10

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

11

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

12

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

13

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

14

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

15
16

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

17

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written

18
19

request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days

20

before the noticed hearing date.

21

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than June 23, 2015, and heard no later

22

than August 4, 2015, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

23

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

24

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

25

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

26

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

27

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

28

to be raised in the motion.
4

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where

1
2

a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in

3

whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4)

4

narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties

5

incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of

6

undisputed facts.

7

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

8

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement

9

of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may

10

be deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file

11

the joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as

12
13

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

14

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

15

September 29, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

16

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

17

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

18

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

19
20

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

21

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

22

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

23

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

24

IX.

25
26

Trial Date
December 1, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

United States District Court Judge.

27

A.

This is a jury trial.

28

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-5 days.
5

C.

1

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

2

California, Rule 285.

3

X.

Settlement Conference
The parties have agreed to engage in private mediation. If the parties desire a conference with

4
5

the Court, they may file a joint written request for a settlement conference.

6

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

7

Techniques to Shorten Trial

8

Not applicable at this time.

9
10
11
12

XII.

Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

13

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

14

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

15

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal

16

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

17

XIV. Other issues

18

At the scheduling conference, counsel alerted the Court that there was a discovery dispute

19

brewing related to requests propounded on Defendant. In particular, Plaintiff seeks the name of the

20

passenger who dropped the bag on Plaintiff, the name of all flight attendants and evidence of other

21

incidents. At this time, the Court does not authorize the filing of a motion to compel. The Court finds

22

that the matter is not yet ripe.

23

As to the name of the passenger and any passenger witnesses, Plaintiffs must narrow their

24

request as best as possible to provide information as to approximately where these people were sitting.

25

Given the size of the airplane at issue, disclosing all passenger names at this time would not be

26

warranted. Once Plaintiff narrows the request, if the request is still objectionable to Defendant counsel

27

SHALL meet and confer about this narrowed request.

28
6

As to the witness-flight attendant, Defendant reports that the flight attendant who assisted

1
2

Plaintiff and, apparently, who witnessed the incident has been identified to Plaintiff. Defendant

3

SHALL make certain that no other staff member on the plane witnessed the incident and, if others are

4

discovered, to produce their names expeditiously.
As to the identification of “other incidents,” Plaintiff must narrow the request in terms of time

5
6

and circumstance and, if the request is still objectionable to Defendant, counsel SHALL meet and

7

confer related to this narrowed request.

8

In the event that these discovery disputes are not resolved after the requests are further refined

9

and further meet and confer efforts are unsatisfactory, counsel SHALL comply with section VI of this

10

order.

11

XV.

12

Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

13

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

14

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

15

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

16

subsequent status conference.

17

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

18

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

19

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

20

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

21

for granting the relief requested.

22

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 15, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
7