Cranford v. Seward
Filing
10
ORDER Dismissing Action, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted Under Section 1983, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/4/14. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ARCHIE CRANFORD,
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE
A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY
BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983
GARRETT SEWARD,
14
Case No. 1:14-cv-00277-SKO (PC)
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
(Docs. 1 and 9)
15
16
Plaintiff Archie Cranford, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 28, 2014. On April 7, 2014, the
18 Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim and ordered Plaintiff to file an
19 amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). More than thirty days have passed
20 and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there
21 is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), this action is HEREBY DISMISSED, with
2 prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under
3 section 1983.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 4, 2014
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?