MP Nexlevel of CA, Inc. v. CVIN, LLC, et al.

Filing 194

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation For Dismissal Without Prejudice of Claims Between Plaintiff MP Nexlevel of California, Inc., Cross Defendant Western Surety Company, and Third-Party Defendant Apex Directional Drilling, LLC, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/7/15. (Marrujo, C)

1 Ben Patrick (SBN 244092)
[e-mail]
2 GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
4 Facsimile:
[phone]
5 Holly J. Newman (MN Bar No. 026457X) (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
6 James D. Kremer (MN Bar No. 211461) (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
7 DEWITT MACKALL CROUNSE & MOORE, S.C.
901 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1400
8 Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]
10 David W. Larson (MN Bar No. 60495) (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
11 MARTIN & SQUIRES, P.A.
332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2750
12 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone: [phone]
13 Facsimile: [phone]
14 Attorneys for Plaintiff
MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
15 and Cross-Defendant
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20

FRESNO DIVISION
MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA,

21 INC.,
22

v.

23 CVIN, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

24
25

AND RELATED COUNTER-, CROSS-,

26 AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-GSA
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE OF CLAIMS BETWEEN
PLAINTIFF MP NEXLEVEL OF
CALIFORNIA, INC., CROSSDEFENDANT WESTERN SURETY
COMPANY, AND THIRD-PARTY
DEFENDANT APEX DIRECTIONAL
DRILLING, LLC

27
28

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF APEX AND MP NEXLEVEL

[1]
1238098v.1

1

This matter came before the Court on a Stipulation for Dismissal Without Prejudice

2 filed by Plaintiff MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. (“MPN”), Cross-Defendant Western Surety
3 Company (“Western”), and Third-Party Defendant Apex Directional Drilling, LLC (“Apex”).
4 Pursuant to that Stipulation,
5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
6

1.

MPN’s

claims

against

Apex

are

hereby

DISMISSED

WITHOUT

7 PREJUDICE;
8

2.

Apex’s claims against MPN and Western are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT

9 PREJUDICE;
10

3.

Nothing in this Order shall have any impact whatsoever on any other claims in

11 the above-captioned action.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED
13 Dated: April 7, 2015
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF APEX AND MP NEXLEVEL

[2]
1238098v.1