MP Nexlevel of CA, Inc. v. CVIN, LLC, et al.

Filing 285

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 18, 2016. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED Steven D. McGee (State Bar No. 71886) 2 smcgee@dowlingaaron.com Matthew R. Dildine (SBN 258685) 3 mdildine@dowlingaaron.com 8080 North Palm Avenue, Third Floor 4 Fresno, CA 93729-8902 Telephone: 559-432-4500 5 Facsimile: 559-432-4590 6 William T. Eliopoulos (State Bar No. 100633) weliopoulos@rutan.com 7 Kaveh Badiei (State Bar No. 215179) kbadiei@rutan.com 8 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Five Palo Alto Square 9 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94306-9814 10 Telephone: 650-320-1500 Facsimile: 650-320-9905 11 Heather N. Herd (State Bar No. 217521) 12 hherd@rutan.com RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 13 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 14 Telephone: 714-641-5100 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 15 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter and Cross16 Claimant CVIN, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 FRESNO DIVISION 20 MP NEXLEVEL of California, Inc., 21 Plaintiff, vs. 22 Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-GSA STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER CVIN, LLC dba VAST NETWORKS, 23 CALAVERAS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, CAL-ORE TELEPHONE Date Action Filed: February 28, 2014 24 CO., CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., Trial Date: July 25, 2017 25 DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY, MOHAVE INVESTMENT, LLC, 26 SEBASTIAN ENTERPRISES, INC., SIERRA TEL BROADBAND, SIERRA 27 TEL COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, STAGELINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 28 SUREWEST FIBER VENTURES, LLC, THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE 174/031672-0001 8779859.1 a05/18/16 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER 1 COMPANY, VARCOMM, INC., VARNET, INC., VOLCANO 2 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, VOLCANO TELECOM, INC., and DOES 1 3 to 100, Defendants. 4 5 AND RELATED COUNTER, CROSS-, AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS. 6 7 8 WHEREAS on April 27, 2016, plaintiff and cross-defendant MP Nexlevel of 9 California, Inc. (“MPN”) noticed its Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative 10 Partial Summary Judgment (the “Motion”) for hearing on May 25, 2016 (ECF 278); 11 WHEREAS on May 6, 2016, this Court: 1) vacated the May 25, 2016 hearing date; 12 2) ordered the deadline for filing defendant, counterclaimant and cross-complainant CVIN, 13 LLC’s (“CVIN”) opposition to the Motion (the “Opposition) continued to June 1, 2016 14 and; 3) ordered the deadline for filing MPN’s reply in support of the Motion (the “Reply”) 15 continued to June 15, 2016 (ECF 282); 16 WHEREAS the parties hereto agree, in order to accommodate the scheduling of 17 depositions, that: 1) the deadline for filing CVIN’s Opposition is continued to June 6, 2016 18 and 2) the deadline for filing MPN’s Reply is continued to June 20, 2016. 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the MPN and CVIN, by and 20 through their counsel of record, that: 1) the deadline for filing CVIN’s Opposition is 21 continued to June 6, 2016 and 2) the deadline for filing MPN’s Reply is continued to June 22 20, 2016. 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 Dated: May 17, 2016 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 25 By: /s/ Heather N. Herd Heather N. Herd Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant and Cross-Complainant CVIN, LLC 26 27 28 174/031672-0001 8779859.1 a05/18/16 -1- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER 1 Dated: May 17, 2016 2 GORDON & REES LLP By: /s/ Ben Patrick Ben Patrick Attorneys for Plaintiff and CrossDefendant MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ May 18, 2016 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 174/031672-0001 8779859.1 a05/18/16 -2- STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?