MP Nexlevel of CA, Inc. v. CVIN, LLC, et al.

Filing 443

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Status Conference currently noticed for 9/13/2018 and CONTINUING it to 10/16/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. To appe ar telephonically, each party is directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file a joint status report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/6/2018. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 William T. Eliopoulos (State Bar No. 100633) weliopoulos@rutan.com 2 Heather N. Herd (State Bar No. 217521) hherd@rutan.com 3 Carrie MacIntosh (State Bar No. 294610) cmacintosh@rutan.com 4 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Five Palo Alto Square 5 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94306-9814 650-320-1500 Facsimile: 650-320-9905 6 Telephone: 7 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter and 8 Cross-Claimant CVIN, LLC, dba VAST NETWORKS 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 11 MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff, 12 JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER vs. 13 Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG 14 CVIN, LLC dba VAST NETWORKS, (ECF No. 442) CALAVERAS COMMUNICATIONS 15 COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 AND 19 RELATED COUNTER, CROSS, AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS. 20 21 WHEREAS on July 10, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 22 Circuit issued its order to reverse and remand the decision of the trial court with respect to 23 Plaintiff MP Nexlevel of California, Inc.’s (“MPC”) Motion for Summary Adjudication. 24 WHEREAS on August 7, 2018, this Court set a telephonic conference call (the 25 “Status Conference”) to take place on September 13, 2018 at 10 a.m. before Magistrate 26 Judge Erica P. Grosjean. 27 / / / 28 2259/031672-0001 12767719.1 a09/06/18 -1- Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE 1 WHEREAS on August 7, 2018, this Court ordered the undersigned parties “to confer 2 and file a joint statement regarding a proposed schedule going forward and indicate whether 3 the parties are interested in either a settlement conference or mediation.” 4 WHEREAS the undersigned have agreed to the terms of a settlement (the 5 “Settlement”) of all claims in this action. 6 WHEREAS the undersigned have agreed that performance under the terms of the 7 Settlement will be completed by October 8, 2018. 8 WHEREAS CVIN and MPC have agreed to continue the Status Conference until 9 after October 8, 2018. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned 10 parties, by and through their counsel of record, that good cause exists to continue the date 11 of the Status Conference until after October 8, 2018. 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 Dated: September 6, 2018 16 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP WILLIAM T. ELIOPOULOS HEATHER N. HERD CARRIE MACINTOSH 17 By: /s William T. Eliopoulos William T. Eliopoulos, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant and Counter and Cross-Claimant CVIN, LLC, dba VAST 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: Signature authorized on September 4, 2018 GORDON & REES LLP 23 BEN PATRICK 24 By: /s/ Ben Patrick Ben Patrick, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant, and Third-Party Plaintiff MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 25 26 27 28 2259/031672-0001 12767719.1 a09/06/18 -2- Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE ORDER 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status Conference, currently set for September 13, 3 2018, is continued to October 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: September 6, 2018 /s/ 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2259/031672-0001 12767719.1 a09/06/18 -3- Case No. 1:14-cv-00288-LJO-EPG JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?