Puckett v. Brandon

Filing 24

ORDER Adopting 19 Findings and Recommendation, Denying Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/09/15. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL A. PUCKETT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. K. BRANDON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:14-cv-00290-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF Nos. 16, 19] Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On December 22, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which 20 was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and 21 Recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No Objections were filed. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 23 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 24 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 22, 2014 is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: February 9, 2015 7 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?