Puckett v. Brandon
Filing
36
ORDER Adopting 31 Findings and Recommendation and Denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/10/16. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DURRELL A. PUCKETT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
K. BRANDON,
15
Defendant.
16
Case No.: 1:14-cv-00290-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
[ECF Nos. 25, 31]
Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On December 14, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation which was
20
served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that objections to the Findings and
21
Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No objections were filed.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
23
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
24
Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 14, 2015, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: February 10, 2016
7
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?