Puckett v. Brandon

Filing 45

ORDER Adopting Findings And Recommendation And Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Injunctive Relief (ECF Nos. 32 , 33 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/25/2016. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DURRELL A. PUCKETT,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

K. BRANDON,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-00290-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 32, 33]

Plaintiff Durrell A. Puckett is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 31, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

21

Recommendation which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that

22

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days. After receiving an

23

extension of time, Plaintiff filed objections on February 25, 2016. (ECF No. 37.)

24

reviewed Plaintiff’s objections and attached documents and notes that they are not responsive to the

25

issue raised in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.

The court has

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

27

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

28

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

and

3
4

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 31, 2015, is adopted in full;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated: March 25, 2016

8

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2