Ramirez v. Deutsche Bank As Trustee et al

Filing 25

ORDER re: Length of Plaintiff's Opposition to JP Morgan Chase N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/22/2014. (Herman, H)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

HONORIO S. RAMIREZ,

ORDER RE: LENGTH OF PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO JP MORGAN CHASE
N.A.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff,

7
v.

8
9

Case No. 1: 14-cv-00308-LJO-BAM

JP MORGAN CHASE N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

10
11
12

/

13
14

15
16

Several motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint are currently before the Court. (Doc. 11, 14,
18.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 24.)
The points and authorities of Plaintiff’s opposition total forty (40) pages. Id.

17
18

Plaintiff is ADMONISHED that this Court’s Standing Order limits “all moving and opposition
briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases” to twenty-five (25) pages.1 Plaintiff is further

19
ADMONISHED that, although he is a pro se litigant, he is nevertheless required to be knowledgeable
20

of, and comply with, this Court’s Local Rules and Standing Orders. LR 183(a). “Failure to comply

21
therewith may be ground for dismissal, judgment by default, or any other sanction appropriate under
22
23

these Rules.” Id.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
Dated:

25

/s/ Barbara

April 22, 2014

A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

_

1

See, http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/assets/File/BAM%20procedures.pdf
1