Deadmon v. Wang et al
Filing
13
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss Action with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/18/15. Dismissal Counts as a Strike pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
Case No. 1:14-cv-00316-LJO-MJS (PC)
RELAUN V. DEADMON,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
Plaintiff,
v.
12
JEFFERY WANG, et al.,
(ECF No. 12)
13
14
Defendants.
DISMISSAL COUNTS AS A STRIKE
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
15
CLERK TO TERMINATE ALL PENDING
MOTIONS AND CLOSE CASE
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
19 rights action filed on March 6, 2014 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
21
On February 25, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and a
recommendation to dismiss the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim (ECF
22
No. 12). Plaintiff filed no objections.
23
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has
25 conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26 Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by
27 proper analysis.
28
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendation filed on February 25,
2015 (ECF No. 12) in full,
4
2.
The action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim and
5
dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to the “three strikes” provision
6
set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and
7
8
3.
9
The Clerk of the Court shall terminate all pending motions and close the
case.
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
March 18, 2015
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?