Endsley v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 49

STIPULATION Regarding the Scheduling of Depositions of Defendant's Agents and ORDER Thereon signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/11/2015. Motion to Compel 35 is DENIED as moot. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kirin K. Virk, State Bar No. 221369 Brandy L. Barnes, State Bar No. 299080 DAMRELL, NELSON, SCHRIMP, PALLIOS, PACHER & SILVA 1601 I Street, Fifth Floor Modesto, CA 95354 Telephone: (209) 526-3500 Facsimile: (209) 526-3534 Counsel for Plaintiffs, L. Stephen Endsley and Endsley Kiernan L.P. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 L. STEPHEN ENDSLEY, Case No. 1:14-cv-00346-LJO-GSA Related Case: 1:14-CV-00671-JLO-GSA Plaintiff, vs. 16 TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1 through 100, 17 Defendant. 18 STIPULATION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANT’S AGENTS AND ORDER THEREON Trial Date: February 23, 2016 (ECF No. 35) 19 WHEREAS on May 28, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application For Order Shortening 20 Time To Hear Their Motion To Compel the taking of depositions of Defendant’s employees as follows: 21 Michelle Cardinale- Tuesday, June 9th 22 Adam Robinson- Wednesday, June 10th 23 Patricia Trawick- Thursday, June 11th 24 Michael Baker- Tuesday, June 16th 25 Renee Collins- Wednesday, June 17th 26 Plaintiffs also sought to compel the taking of depositions of Mr. Robinson and Ms. Collins in 27 Modesto, California; 28 Damrell Nelson Schrimp Pallios Pacher & Silva A Professional Corporation 1 STIPULATION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANT’S AGENTS AND ORDER THEREON 1 2 WHEREAS the Honorable Gary S. Austin granted an Order Shortening Time to 3 hear Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel on June 5, 2015 and scheduled an informal telephonic 4 conference with counsel for the Parties on June 4, 2015; 5 WHEREAS on June 4, 2015, the Honorable Gary S. Austin convened an informal 6 telephonic conference with Plaintiffs’ counsel, Kirin K. Virk and Brandy L. Barnes, and 7 Defendant’s counsel, Edward Murphy, and ordered the Parties to inform the Court by 3:00 p.m. as 8 to whether they were able to informally resolve the scheduling of Defendant’s employees 9 depositions and the locations for the depositions of Mr. Robinson and Ms. Collins; 10 11 WHEREAS on June 4, 2015, the Parties agreed to the following schedule for the taking of depositions of Defendant’s employees: 12 13 A. The following depositions to be conducted at 9:00 a.m. at the Modesto office of Damrell, Nelson, Schrimp, Pallios, Pacher & Silva: 14 1. Michelle Cardinale- Wednesday, June 24th 15 2. Patricia Trawick- Thursday, June 25th 16 3. Mike Baker- Friday, June 26th 17 B. The Parties agreed that the depositions of Mr. Robinson and Ms. Collins would be 18 taken during the week of July 20th, with Mr. Robinson’s deposition preceding that of Ms. Collins 19 and that they would be deposed, respectively, in Connecticut and Georgia and /or by video 20 conference at the election of Plaintiffs’ counsel. 21 1. The Parties have subsequently clarified and agreed that the deposition of Mr. 22 Robinson will be taken by Plaintiffs’ counsel in Hartford, Connecticut and/or or by video 23 conference on Tuesday, July 21st at 9:00 a.m. and 2. The deposition of Ms. Collins will be taken by Plaintiffs’ counsel in Atlanta, 24 25 Georgia and/or by video conference on Thursday, July 23rd at 9:00 a.m. 26 WHEREAS on June 4, 2015, Plaintiffs informed the Court that the Parties had agreed upon 27 28 Damrell Nelson Schrimp Pallios Pacher & Silva A Professional Corporation a deposition schedule and Plaintiffs’ Motion To Compel was taken off calendar. /// 2 STIPULATION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANT’S AGENTS AND ORDER THEREON 1 2 3 /// WE HEREBY AGREE AND CONSENT to the terms of the above Stipulation: DAMRELL, NELSON, SCHRIMP, PALLIOS, PACHER & SILVA 4 5 Dated: June 11, 2015 6 7 By /s/ Kirin K. Virk______________ Kirin K. Virk Attorney for Plaintiffs L. Stephen Endsley and Endsley Kiernan, L.P. 8 9 FORAN GLENNON PALANDECH PONZI & RUDLOFF PC 10 11 Dated: June 10, 2015 12 13 14 By /s/ Edward P. Murphy___________ G. Edward Rudloff, Jr. Edward P. Murphy Jennifer N. Wahlgren Attorneys For Defendant Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company 15 ORDER 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 The Court has reviewed and adopts the above Stipulation regarding the taking of Defendant’s employees’ depositions. The above schedule may only be modified by mutual agreement of counsel and/or by Court order. The terms of the Stipulation resolve the disputes between the parties raised in the Motion to Compel (ECF No. 35). Thus, the Motion to Compel is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: June 11, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 Damrell Nelson Schrimp Pallios Pacher & Silva A Professional Corporation 3 STIPULATION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANT’S AGENTS AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?