Selvick v. Brazelton, et al.
Filing
12
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS WINSLOW AND IGBINOSA TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT re 11 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/11/2014. (Filing Deadline: 7/3/2014). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DALE D. SELVICK,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
PAUL D. BRAZELTON, et al.,
Defendants.
1:14-cv-00363-GSA-PC
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS WINSLOW AND
IGBINOSA TO FILE RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 11.)
DEADLINE: JULY 3, 2014
16
17
Dale D. Selvick (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil
18
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this
19
action on March 11, 2014. (Doc. 1.)
20
On June 9, 2014, Plaintiff and defendants Winslow and Igbinosa filed a stipulation
21
under Local Rule 144(a) extending time until July 3, 2014 for defendants Winslow and
22
Igbinosa to respond to the Complaint. (Doc. 11.) The parties also submitted a proposed order
23
for the court.
24
In this instance, a court order is not needed to extend time. Local Rule 144(a) provides
25
that “[u]nless the filing date has been set by order of the Court, an initial stipulation extending
26
time for no more than twenty-eight (28) days to respond to a complaint . . . may be filed
27
without approval of the Court if the stipulation is signed on behalf of all parties who have
28
appeared in the action and are affected by the stipulation. All other extensions of time must be
1
1
approved by the Court.” L.R. 144(a). The parties’ stipulation satisfies all of the requirements
2
of Local Rule 144(a) to extend time without court approval. Thus, the time for defendants
3
Winslow and Igbinosa to respond to the Complaint was extended to July 3, 2014, by the
4
parties’ stipulation of June 9, 2014.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 11, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?